WebNov 2, 2024 · Running Down That Hillside. We now have the judgment of the Supreme Court in Hillside Parks Limited v Snowdonia National Park Authority (2 November 2024). The case concerns the relationship between successive grants of planning permission for development on the same land and, in particular, about the effect of implementing one … WebNov 2, 2024 · Hillside Parks Limited ( Hillside) is the current owner and developer of the Site, having acquired it in 1988. Since the 1967 Permission was granted, only 41 houses have …
Hillside in the Supreme Court: what next for ‘drop in’ permissions?
WebFeb 18, 2024 · James Burton provides an insightful heads up on a case which has raised questions about overlapping or ‘drop in’ permissions and has wide implications for the development industry, and which is now heading for the Supreme Court. Readers may recall the decision of the Court of Appeal in Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park … WebA recent decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2024] EWCA Civ 1440 (“Hillside”) has raised eyebrows in the … ravpower 61w wall charger
Hillside Revisited- Supreme Court gives judgment on …
WebNov 8, 2024 · Back in December 2024 we analysed the Court of Appeal's decision in the case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2024] EWCA Civ 1440, in which the Court held that implementation of a masterplan pursuant to a 1967 permission was no longer possible due to developments carried out under later permissions (our December … WebDec 8, 2024 · Combined with the recent Court of Appeal decision in Finney v Welsh Ministers [2024] EWCA Civ 1868, which prohibited the use of section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to vary a ... WebHillside –what did it decide? • Pilkington approach confirmed • Court of Appeal followed: –Sage - planning permissions should be interpreted “holistically” –Singh - for a development to be lawful it must be carried out "fully in accordance with any final permission under which it is done” • Lucas not overruled but held to be “decided on its own facts”: ravpower ac